Friday, December 16, 2016

Was there a virgin birth before the incarnation of Jesus?

Isaiah 7:10-17 

The sign of Immanuel

Again the Lord spoke to Ahaz: 11 “Ask a sign of the Lord your God; let it be deep as Sheol or high as heaven.” 12 But Ahaz said, “I will not ask, and I will not put the Lord to the test.” 13 And he said, “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? 14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. 15 He shall eat curds and honey when he knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good. 16 For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted. 17 The Lord will bring upon you and upon your people and upon your father's house such days as have not come since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah—the king of Assyria!”

To be clear, there was not a virgin birth before Christ, but as Isaiah says, “virgin will give birth to a child”. That does not mean a virgin in the sense of someone who has never had relationships with a man. So, here’s what’s going on and it’s very interesting…if you look at what happens in Matthew 1, Matthew recognizes a historical pattern of events that finds quintessential fulfillment in the miraculous birth of Messiah. So, if you look at the precursor (or the type), it happens in the book of Isaiah. Isaiah’s wife gave birth to Maher-shalal-hash-baz in a fashion common to all humanity, thus though she did not give birth as a virgin. However, Mary (Jesus’s mother) most certainly did. So again, what Matthew sees is a historical pattern of events that finds quintessential fulfillment in a miraculous virgin birth with respect of Messiah.

But if you look at the historical context of Isaiah 7, you have Ahaz, he’s the Monarch of the tiny kingdom of Judah, he’s shaken because there are two super-powers on his northern flank. One is Resin of Syria the other is Pica of Israel, so these two kings these two super-powers are plotting his ruin. And so what God does is He provides a sign guaranteeing that those two Kings would come to ruin. And the way He does that is by saying that the virgin will be with child, will give birth to a son, and will call him Emmanuel, and before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste.

Of course what God promises comes to pass, Isaiah went to the prophetess, she conceived, she gave birth to a son and before the boy knew how to say “my father or my mother”, both of those super-powers Syria and Samaria were laid waste…by what happened to be the Assyrians. Well 700 years after faithless Ahaz, Matthew saw the temporary salvation of Judah as a type of the eternal salvation that God’s people would experience through Jesus Christ, who is quite literally born of a virgin. 

The Hebrew word ALMAH (virgin) found in Isaiah 7 has nothing to do with virginity, and is wholly irrelevant to the discussion, because what this has to do with is prophecy (but it is typological prophecy). Which sees historical correspondence but a heightened factor in the anti-type. So, in the type you have a birth in the normal course of how human beings give birth, in the anti-type you have an intensification which you have a literal virgin birth. 

And ultimately Isaiah knew this was bigger than the immediate fulfillment in Isaiah chapter 8.

In stark contrast, some in the Word of Faith movement have taken Isaiah's prophecy in chapter 7 and turned it on its head by proclaiming that Jesus was just a human boy (because he didn't know right and wrong) until His baptism where he was filled with the Holy Spirit...They also claim that because of this, we have the same power at our infilling of the Holy SpiritYou see, purveyors of the Word of Faith lower Jesus to elevate the power of the 'Holy Spirit' within themselves, but in actuality… they are elevating themselves because they preach a different Jesus, and a different holy spirit...And this one of the reasons that makes their cultic movement so dangerous.

Now we don't know the circumstances of Jesus becoming self-aware that He was Theanthropos (the God-man) because the Bible is somewhat silent in that respect...but we do know that the Bible is very clear that Jesus was/is FULLY God and fully man and we also know that He amazed the religious leaders in the temple at age 12.

In conclusion, let us remind ourselves Jesus is God (and we are not), He came into this world because of His love for us and to reconciled the world to Himself...He died a sinners death on the cross and on the third day He rose again and is now seated at the right hand of the Father  - and has promised us that He will return again a second time.

And we look forward with joy, to the restoration of all things.

Monday, February 15, 2016

Is Mysticism a Christian practice?

Eric Gilmour - christian mystic

Is Mysticism a Christian practice? 


Mysticism - defined
1. The experience of mystical union or direct communion with ultimate reality reported by mystics.

2. The belief that direct knowledge of God, spiritual truth, or ultimate reality can be attained through subjective* experience (as intuition* or insight).

3. Vague speculation: a belief without sound basis. A theory postulating* the possibility of direct and intuitive* acquisition* of ineffable* knowledge or power. 

*subjective
1.philosophy: relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind, based on feelings or opinions rather than facts.

*intuition/intuitive 
1.having the ability to know or understand things without any proof or evidence.

*postulate 
1.suggest or assume the existence, fact, or truth of (something) as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or belief.

*acquisition 
1. the act of acquiring or something or someone acquired or gained.

*ineffable 
1.incapable of being expressed in words.

----------------------------------------

Subjective or Objective?


We must never base our relationship with Jesus on subjective philosophy, this can (and many times will) lead to deception. 

We must base our Christianity on objective truth of who Jesus is, and who Jesus is to us.

Our Faith is only as good as the object in which it is placed...and a life of living Trust in Jesus is well placed faith. Faith doesn't need to be seen with our eyes or proven by a mystical feeling...Faith is the assurance and trust in the unseen. Hebrews 11

The Christian faith is not true because it works; it works because it is true. It is not true because we experience it; we experience it—deeply and gloriously—because it is true.

Objective truth is proven in the pages of God's Divinely inspired Word, which is the only repository of redemptive revelation.

---------------------------------------

View this short video (with mystic - Eric Gilmour).

We need to recognize that 'Christian mystics' distract from the true Gospel of Jesus as they point to practices taught by the philosophies of men, rather than what is clearly taught by Jesus and His disciples

I encourage you not to take my word for it, but to search the Scriptures as the Bereans did. And look to see if Jesus taught what Eric Gilmour is talking about. As a matter of fact, Eric does not reference anything truly Biblical in this video, for the most part he only quotes other mystics. It may sound well and good and very pious, but this is a very dangerous teaching.

Colossians 2:6-8 So then, just as you received Christ Jesus as Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him, strengthened in the faith as you were taught, and overflowing with thankfulness. See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.


Colossians 2: 18-23 Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you. Such a person also goes into great detail about what they have seen; they are puffed up with idle notions by their unspiritual mind. They have lost connection with the head, from whom the whole body, supported and held together by its ligaments and sinews, grows as God causes it to grow. Since you died with Christ to the elemental spiritual forces of this world, why, as though you still belonged to the world, do you submit to its rules: “Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!”? These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish with use, are based on merely human commands and teachings. Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.


I share in the Apostle Paul's heart, and he sums this up so beautifully... "and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears."
Acts 20:28-31 Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears.